Importance of Reverse Breeding in the Modern Plant Breeding Era
Abstract
Reverse breeding is a new technique that
produces homozygous parental lines from the heterozygous plant, antagonistic to the conventional Plant breeding varietal development method. Reverse breeding bears
huge importance in crop breeding because of its significant applications, like
generation of chromosome substitution lines that make it easy to study the effects
of an individual gene phenotypically, QTLs identification would be quicker, and
help in the interpretation of gene interactions. Reverse breeding also
generates new heterozygous germplasm that can be applied in a hybridization
program. There were many barriers to breaking the hybrid into parental lines before
the discovery of reverse breeding techniques; now, more stable hybrid crop
performance is possible. Reverse breeding involves transformation steps, but the
products are free from transgenes, similar to conventionally bred plants. Reverse
breeding has high possibilities, but it is not commercialized yet. Since Reverse
breeding is an emerging technique, still investigations are needed to confirm
its applications and limitations.
Introduction
Humans have always been in search of new tools
and techniques that could improve their crop production considering thousands
of years. They have developed many techniques to feed the world with better
crop varieties (Guan et al., 2015). The intensive research on crop science
makes it possible to generate novel crop breeding methods that could secure the food supply system forever. One most innovative ways that produces complementary
homozygous parental lines from the hybrid plant is Reverse Breeding (RB), the
concept pioneered by Rob Dirks in 2009. RB technique is possible due to the fast
growth in molecular biology and crop gene sequencing.

Also read: Genetic recombination Speed breeding Species
Reverse breeding is a novel approach
outlined to directly produce complementary parental lines for any heterozygous
plant, one of the most sought-after goals in Plant breeding. It is a de novo
Plant breeding approach that produces homozygous parental lines from any
hybrids. The method of RB is based on engineered meiosis whereby selected
heterozygote genetic recombinations are reduced by eliminating meiotic
crossing over (Dirks et al., 2009). RB could fundamentally change the future of
Plant breeding as classical breeding fails to fix the unknown heterozygous
genotypes. Though reverse breeding has wide applications, it has not been
commercialized yet.
Reverse
Breeding, Reverse Genetics, and Forward Genetics
Reverse genetics is a procedure of understanding the function of a gene by interpreting the phenotypic effects of specific engineered gene sequences. It seeks to find the result of particular genetic sequences on crop phenotypes, while Forward genetics finds the genetic basis of a phenotype or a trait. Reverse genetics involves functional analysis of phenotype based on genotype, whereas Forward genetics studies the position of a genotype based on phenotype. In the same way, forward breeding is a kind of backcross breeding method that takes advantage of improved cultivars and genetic knowledge that might have been developed during the process of backcross breeding.
Why
Reverse Breeding?
Reverse breeding has huge importance in
modern Plant breeding as it generates complementary homozygous parental lines
from the heterozygous plant. Since the homozygous parental lines are
fundamental materials for a stable hybrid, RB is needed to maintain the
hybrid stability. RB fixes parental genes and thus improves parental lines
genetically to enhance the hybrid performance. RB establishes the breeding
lines for uncharacterized heterozygote and also multiplies a highly heterozygous
plant from homozygous parental lines (Wijnker et al., 2012).
Reverse breeding speeds up the breeding
process and increases the number of available genetic combinations, allowing
breeders to respond much quicker to the needs of farmers with better crop varieties.
It facilitates the selection of superior hybrids, and large populations of plants
can be generated, screened, and well-performing plants can be regenerated
indefinitely without prior knowledge of their genetic constitutions.

Mechanism
of Reverse breeding
Reverse breeding involves mainly three steps
1) Suppression of meiotic recombination
2) Doubled haploid formation and
3) Selection of complementary lines through marker-assisted selection
Suppression of meiotic recombination
Reverse breeding initiates with gamete
formation. Start suppressing the crossing over during spore formation at the meiotic stage. This step is known as suppression of meiotic recombination.
Suppression is done in two ways: either by suppressing the genes required for
meiotic recombination or by exogenous application of chemical compounds.
Suppress the genes by RNAi to completely knock down the function of DMC1 homologue
to RecA, a meiosis-specific recombinase essential for the formation of crossover. Some genes responsible for meiotic recombination are Disrupted Meiotic
cDNA (DMC1), Sporulation Deficient 11 (SPO11), and Rec, whose functions are knocked down by RNAi during spore formation. To proceed with the suppression of genes
by RNAi, exogenous chemicals (e.g., Mirin) are also applied, which inhibit the
recombination during meiosis would speeding up the application of RB (Dupree,
2008). Mirin causes G2 arrest and inhibits the phosphorylation of ATM (Ataxia
Telangiectasia Mutated (ATM).
Double haploid formation
Use the tissue culture technique to produce double-haploid plants from the haploid. Obtain haploids from the immature pollens after suppression by RNAi. The special technique of tissue culture is referred to as anther culture and isolated microspore culture, where immature pollen grains grow to produce colonies of cells. Transfer the colonies to a medium with different plant growth regulators and sugars to induce the growth of shoots and then roots. Use colchicine to double the chromosome number of haploids into diploids.
Selection of complementary lines through marker-assisted selection
The plants formed after tissue culture
techniques might be aneuploids, haploids, or double haploids. Select only
double haploids to run specific primers, quit the haploids and aneuploids. The
used primers confirm the complementary homozygous lines, which are compared with
the F1. Conduct field-based phenotyping to confirm the results.
Crossing of appropriate doubled haploid lines to develop superior hybrids
Cross the appropriate double-haploid complementary
lines to obtain the parents. Check the level of similarity of synthetic parents
with the original parents at the genetic and morphological levels.
Wijnker and Jong (2008) described that
at regular meiosis, a chiasma is formed during crossing over. While reverse
breeding is based on achiasmatic meiosis, a meiotic phenomenon where there is
formation of no crossing over. Thus, the products obtained are homozygous at the double haploid stage. Only those DH plants are selected for reverse breeding
that are complementary homologous to each other.
The number of DH plants required for
reverse breeding might vary depending on crop species. Each crop species has a unique chromosome number, and the number of chromosomes is a key factor in deciding the number of non-recombinant double haploids required for reconstructing the
original starting plant at different probability levels in various species. For
example, Arabidopsis has a haploid chromosome number of 5; thus, at a 90 % level of
probability, the DHs required are 13, while at 95%, 99% and 100% levels of
probability, the DHs required are 14, 18, and 47. Similarly, rice, tomato, eggplant, pepper, and melon have 12 haploid chromosome numbers; thus, at a 90%
probability level, the 138 DHs are required for reconstructing the original
starting plants (Wijnker and Jong, 2008).
Comparison of the end products of reverse breeding and conventionally bred plants
Controversy arises with the use of genetic engineering techniques to improve crop plants. One strongly believes GE modified crops are harmful to human beings. Many countries have strong regulations for the entry of GE modified crops. Reverse breeding also uses GE techniques to suppress meiotic crossover during spore formation, but only those double haploids are selected that are free from transgenes. The transgene products (recruit parents without RNA construct) and aneuploids are discarded so that reverse-breeding breds are similar to conventionally bred plants.
The end products of Reverse Breeding are similar to parental lines obtained by Conventional breeding. The RNAi silencing is restricted only to meiotic crossover suppression, but there will be no change in the DNA sequences of reverse bred plants. Thus, the resulting offspring can be regarded as non-genetically modified.
Construction of heterozygous germplasm
Construct heterozygous germplasm from
segregating F2 generations by applying reverse breeding methods. Each line
from F2 generations is heterozygous, which could be used as a starting hybrid.
For those crops where there is a lack of breeding lines, RB could accelerate the
development of varieties. Superior heterozygous plants can be propagated
without prior knowledge of their genetic constitution.
Breeding on the single chromosome level
Chromosome substitution lines differ
from the others by at least one chromosome. Reverse breeding explains
how chromosome substitution lines can be obtained when it is applied to an F1
hybrid of known parents. These chromosome substitution lines provide novel
tools for the study of gene interactions. It also helps to study plants on a genetic basis. For example, offspring of plants in which just one chromosome is
heterozygous will segregate for the traits present on that chromosome only. Development
of improved breeding lines carrying introgressed traits is also possible
(Kumari et al, 2018).
Reverse Breeding and Marker-Assisted Selection
Reverse
breeding combined with marker-assisted selection speeds up the identification
of complementary homozygous plants from the populations of DHs. Chromosome
substitution lines produced through reverse breeding could be integrated with
marker-assisted selection that allows the quick identification of QTLs. Gene
reporting and gene tagging approaches become easier and simpler. Helps in the study of
gene interaction in the heterozygous inbred families, the generation of chromosome-specific linkage maps becomes uncomplicated, and fine mapping of genes and
alleles is possible. Reverse breeding with marker-aided selection also helps in
studying the nature of heterotic plants.
Back Crossing in the CMS background
In
several vegetable crops, such as cabbage and carrots, breeders make use of
cytoplasmic male sterility (CMS). In these systems, the presence of male
sterility presents a special challenge to RB. In these cases, gynogenesis
rather than androgenesis can be used to obtain DH plants. This is perfectly compatible
with RB in the sense that the chromosomes from the maintainer line can be
recovered directly in the cytoplasm of the sterile line in one step.
Limitations of
RNA-induced Reverse Breeding
•
Development
of RB is limited to those crops where DH technology is common practice, eg,
cucumber, onion, broccoli, sugarbeet, maize, pea, and sorghum.
•
There
are some exceptions , such as soybean, cotton, lettuce, and tomato, where doubled
haploid plants are rarely formed or not available at all.
•
The
technique is limited to crops with a haploid chromosome number of 12 or less
and in which spores cannot be regenerated into DHs.
Marker-Assisted Reverse Breeding and RNA-Mediated Reverse Breeding
MARB
•
No
need for gene silencing.
•
1-
1.5 years for the development of homozygous lines.
•
No
limitations in crops with < 12 haploid chromosome no.
•
Not
limited to crops where DH is not possible.
•
No
need for sophisticated transformation techniques like DHs.
RMRB
•
Need
for silencing.
•
2-2.5
years for the development of homozygous lines.
•
Limitations
in crops with < 12 haploid chromosome no.
•
Limited
to crops where DH is not possible.
•
Young
technique, hence requires more research to suppress crossover
Consequences
for food and environmental safety
•
RNA-directed
DNA methylation transmitted to the offspring will only have an effect on
meiotic recombination and no genetic modification-related DNA sequences.
•
Reverse
bred crops are similar to those of parental lines and F1-hybrids obtained by
conventional breeding.
The organization works in Reverse Breeding
•
CHIC Project (www.chicproject.eu)
•
Rijk Zwaan Breeding bv, Eerste Kruisweg 9, 4793 RS Fijnaart, The
Netherlands
•
NBT Platform (www.nbtplatform.org)
•
European Plant Science Organization
Conclusion
RB
is a novel breeding approach that accelerates the breeding process. Increases
the available genetic combinations. A large number of plants are generated,
screened, and regenerated without prior knowledge of their genetic constitution.
Thus, RB puts this century-long endeavor upside down by starting with superior
hybrid selection followed by recovery of parental lines.
Future thrust
Mediated Reverse Breeding is a young work that requires extensive study to overcome technical problems. Additional research is required to improve the efficiency of the DH production. Emphasis should be given to the production of hybrids in crops like cucumber, onion, broccoli, and cauliflower, where seed production is problematic.
Keywords: Reverse breeding, Forward breeding, Reverse genetics, Forward genetics, Doubled haploids, Homozygous complementary lines
References
Dirks,
R., Dun, K.V., Snoo, C.B., Berg, M.V., Cilia, L.C., Lelivelt ,Woudenberg, W.V.,
Wit, J., Reinink, K., Schut, J.W, Zeeuw, W., Vogelaar, A., Freymark, G.,
Gutteling, W., Keppel, N.M., Drongelen, P.N, Kieny, M., Ellul, P., Touraev, M.,
Ma, H., Jong, H.D. and Wijnker, E. 2009. Reverse
breeding: a novel breeding approach based on engineered meiosis. Plant Biotechnology Journal.7, pp. 837–8457.
Guan,
Yi-Xin, Wang, Bao-hua, Feng, Yan, Li, Ping 2015.
Development and application of marker-assisted reverse breeding using hybrid
maize germplasm. Journal of Integrative
Agriculture, 14(12): 2538–2546.
Kumari,
P., Nilanjaya, Singh, N.K. 2018. Reverse
breeding: Accelerating innovation in Plant Breeding. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry,SP1: 1811-1813.
Wijnker,
E. and Jong, H.D. 2008. Managing meiotic recombination in
plant breeding. Trends Plant Sciences.3:640–646.
Wijnker,
K.V., Snoo, C.B.D., Lelivelt, C.L.C., Joost, K.B., Naharudin, N.S., Ravi, M., Chan, W.L., de Jong, H., Dirks, R. 2012.
Reverse breeding in Arabidopsis thaliana generates homozygous parental lines
from a heterozygous plant. Nature
genetics. DOI: 10.1038/ng.2203.
Comments
Post a Comment